Software Engineers: Paid Code Review for AI Agent Evaluation
Listed by employer · Checked
Posted within 60 days ·
- Work arrangement
- remote
- Employment
- Contract
- Stated compensation
- Not specified
- Stated sponsorship
- Not stated
Does the location policy fit?
Choose where you would work from. We’ll compare it with the posting’s stated requirements.
Choose a country to check geographic compatibility. The source requirements are available below.
This checks the posting’s stated requirements, not your legal right to work. Confirm details with the employer.
Requirements
2 with evidence7 unclear or unstated- Remote policy
- remote
“Provider workplace type: remote”
From employer posting metadata - Geographic scope
- US
“Provider location: United States”
From employer posting metadata - Employment type
- Contract
8 fields not stated in this posting
- Employer sponsorship
- Not specified
- Degree requirement
- Not specified
- Security clearance
- Not mentioned
- Timezone / hours
- Not specified
- Citizenship requirement
- Not mentioned
- Minimum experience (years)
- Not specified
- Work authorization
- Not specified
- Compensation
- Not specified
These details were not stated in the tracked posting. Confirm with the employer.
Original job description
Reading view uses normalized posting text so exact evidence excerpts can be highlighted.
Show less description
Original formatting and links
What We're Researching
We're running a paid study on the coding environments and programming tasks used to benchmark artificial intelligence agents. Creating robust evaluation harnesses ensures that AI models are tested against realistic software engineering scenarios. This work directly feeds into improving how autonomous agents handle complex coding objectives.
How It Works
During this remote session, you will review a series of coding tasks and their corresponding evaluation harnesses. You will assess whether the programming challenges accurately reflect real-world software engineering problems. We will ask you to verify the logic, test cases, and overall structure of the environments provided. Your technical feedback will be captured through a guided conversation and screen-sharing exercises.
Who This Is For
We are looking for practicing software engineers with strong backgrounds in building and testing complex systems. Candidates should have direct experience writing test suites, evaluation harnesses, or comprehensive code reviews. We welcome backend engineers, full-stack developers, machine learning engineers, and software architects.
What You'll Do
Review realistic programming tasks for accuracy and difficulty
Verify the logic and test cases within provided evaluation harnesses
Assess whether coding environments effectively measure software engineering skills
Walk us through your thought process while analyzing complex code structures
Who Should Apply
Active professional experience as a software engineer
Hands-on experience building or maintaining test suites and evaluation harnesses
Comfortable reviewing code and explaining technical concepts aloud
Familiarity with complex real-world software architecture
Compensation
$65 per hour
Ready to participate?
About Terac
Terac is building the world's largest pool of vetted human experts for AI. Researchers, AI labs, and product teams use Terac to recruit, screen, and pay study participants across industries, languages, and skill sets.
Learn more at terac.com or on YouTube at @jointerac.
Matched by role category. Review each posting’s requirements before applying.