Pharmacists: Paid Expert Review for Clinical AI Benchmarks
Listed by employer · Checked
Posted within 60 days ·
- Work arrangement
- remote
- Employment
- Contract
- Stated compensation
- Not specified
- Stated sponsorship
- Not stated
Does the location policy fit?
Choose where you would work from. We’ll compare it with the posting’s stated requirements.
Not enough information in this posting — confirm with the employer
Checked for applicants in United States; employer sponsorship is needed. Based on the source posting · not a hiring or work-authorization guarantee.
Visa sponsorship is not specified.
Why this result?
2 supporting signals
- The stated geographic scope includes your country.
- The role is described as remote; geographic restrictions still apply.
1 still unclear
- Visa sponsorship is not specified.
This checks the posting’s stated requirements, not your legal right to work. Confirm details with the employer.
Requirements
2 with evidence7 unclear or unstated- Remote policy
- remote
“Provider workplace type: remote”
From employer posting metadata - Geographic scope
- US
“Provider location: United States”
From employer posting metadata - Employment type
- Contract
8 fields not stated in this posting
- Employer sponsorship
- Not specified
- Degree requirement
- Not specified
- Security clearance
- Not mentioned
- Timezone / hours
- Not specified
- Citizenship requirement
- Not mentioned
- Minimum experience (years)
- Not specified
- Work authorization
- Not specified
- Compensation
- Not specified
These details were not stated in the tracked posting. Confirm with the employer.
Original job description
Reading view uses normalized posting text so exact evidence excerpts can be highlighted.
Show less description
Original formatting and links
What We're Researching
We're running a paid study on clinical decision-making to help benchmark medical AI systems. This work feeds directly into improving how automated tools interpret pharmaceutical data and patient cases. Your medical expertise ensures these emerging technologies rely on accurate, real-world clinical standards.
How It Works
You will review a series of de-identified clinical cases and pharmaceutical product images through our remote platform. For each case, you will provide detailed expert reviews and help develop scoring rubrics for AI evaluation. The workflow involves assessing the provided data, identifying key clinical markers, and documenting your professional judgment. You will complete these tasks asynchronously while following our structured evaluation guidelines.
Who This Is For
We are looking for practicing pharmacists with strong clinical evaluation skills. We welcome retail pharmacists, clinical pharmacists, and those working in specialized hospital settings. Candidates should be highly comfortable reviewing patient cases and communicating complex medical reasoning clearly.
What You'll Do
Review de-identified clinical cases and pharmaceutical product images.
Develop scoring rubrics based on standard clinical practices.
Provide written expert evaluations to serve as reference benchmarks.
Assess the accuracy of various medical data interpretations.
Who Should Apply
Actively practicing pharmacist
Experience reviewing and evaluating clinical patient cases
Comfortable navigating digital review platforms
Strong written communication skills for documenting medical reasoning
Compensation
$90 per task
Ready to participate?
About Terac
Terac is building the world's largest pool of vetted human experts for AI. Researchers, AI labs, and product teams use Terac to recruit, screen, and pay study participants across industries, languages, and skill sets.
Learn more at terac.com or on YouTube at @jointerac.
No similar roles found yet — browse all terac jobs.
Explore stated remote geography
These collections reflect applicant location statements, not authorization or citizenship.