abundant

Member of Technical Staff, Alignment

Listed by employer · Checked

Posted within 60 days ·

  • onsite
  • FullTime
  • Engineering
  • San Francisco
Work arrangement
onsite
Employment
FullTime
Stated compensation
Not specified
Apply on company website ↗
01 / A QUICK CHECK BEFORE YOU APPLY

Does the location policy fit?

Choose where you would work from. We’ll compare it with the posting’s stated requirements.

Choose the country you will work from. You can change this anytime.

Country and sponsorship changes take effect when you click Check eligibility.

Choose a country to check geographic compatibility. The source requirements are available below.

Source: ashbyChecked Original posting ↗

Requirements

1 with evidence8 unclear or unstated
Remote policy
onsite
“Provider workplace type: onsite”
From employer posting metadata
Employment type
FullTime
9 fields not stated in this posting
Employer sponsorship
Not specified
Geographic scope
Not specified
Degree requirement
Not specified
Security clearance
Not mentioned
Timezone / hours
Not specified
Citizenship requirement
Not mentioned
Minimum experience (years)
Not specified
Work authorization
Not specified
Compensation
Not specified

These details were not stated in the tracked posting. Confirm with the employer.

READ IT IN THE EMPLOYER’S OWN WORDS

Original job description

Reading view uses normalized posting text so exact evidence excerpts can be highlighted.

ABOUT ABUNDANTAbundant is an applied research lab focused on scaling reinforcement learning for safe and reliable agentic capabilities. We are an extremely talent-dense team of researchers, roboticists, founders, and operators whose work includes the Waymo Driver.  THE ROLEFrontier labs test their models in environments like ours, which means we are the first to see novel model behavior. You will make sure that alignment is baked into everything the do: the code we deploy, the runbooks we write, and the papers we publish.  WHAT YOU’LL DORun experiments on how our environments shape behavior: reward hacking, cheating the task, unsafe use of tools, deception over long runs. Then change how we build them.
Read full descriptionShow less description
Break our own graders. Find the ways to score well without doing the work, close them, and keep the attacks as tests everyone runs. Build the tools that watch agents: monitors over trajectories, red team harnesses, and safety benchmarks that stay hard as models improve. On real runs, not toy ones. Keep our environments sealed. Network isolation, escapes, credentials, and how much damage an agent can do when it turns on us. Last summer’s failures came from here. Choose a research question about oversight, control, or long-horizon autonomy, answer it, and publish. This is part of the job, not something you do at night. Decide what we will not build. Tell partners plainly what they get from us is and is not safe for. WHO YOU AREYou are an engineer first. You build your own test pipelines, learn strange codebases quickly, and find the bug in the log. You know LLM safety in depth: attacks, red teaming, monitoring and control evaluations, reward hacking. You can turn a vague worry about a model into an experiment, run it, and say what the result does and does not prove. You read transcripts closely. You catch the small thing that makes the whole result wrong. You have put research into production systems, especially post-training, distillation, or evaluation that something depends on. You write clearly enough that your results change what other people do. You can decide fast with incomplete evidence and defend the call with data. NICE TO HAVEPublished work on control, dangerous capability evaluations, oversight, or interpretability. RLHF or RLAIF experience, and a view on how training choices show up in behavior. You built or ran a public benchmark or agent task suite. You have run many agents at once: sandboxes, containers, logging. You have advised on AI safety or governance policy. COMPENSATIONBase Salary $250,000 - $450,000 Cash Bonus Sizable performance bonus tied to project and company milestones Equity Generous early-stage grant Benefits Health, dental, vision + flexible PTO
Original formatting and links
ABOUT ABUNDANT

Abundant is an applied research lab focused on scaling reinforcement learning for safe and reliable agentic capabilities. We are an extremely talent-dense team of researchers, roboticists, founders, and operators whose work includes the Waymo Driver.

 THE ROLE

Frontier labs test their models in environments like ours, which means we are the first to see novel model behavior. You will make sure that alignment is baked into everything the do: the code we deploy, the runbooks we write, and the papers we publish.

 WHAT YOU’LL DO
  • Run experiments on how our environments shape behavior: reward hacking, cheating the task, unsafe use of tools, deception over long runs. Then change how we build them.

  • Break our own graders. Find the ways to score well without doing the work, close them, and keep the attacks as tests everyone runs.

  • Build the tools that watch agents: monitors over trajectories, red team harnesses, and safety benchmarks that stay hard as models improve. On real runs, not toy ones.

  • Keep our environments sealed. Network isolation, escapes, credentials, and how much damage an agent can do when it turns on us. Last summer’s failures came from here.

  • Choose a research question about oversight, control, or long-horizon autonomy, answer it, and publish. This is part of the job, not something you do at night.

  • Decide what we will not build. Tell partners plainly what they get from us is and is not safe for.

WHO YOU ARE
  • You are an engineer first. You build your own test pipelines, learn strange codebases quickly, and find the bug in the log.

  • You know LLM safety in depth: attacks, red teaming, monitoring and control evaluations, reward hacking.

  • You can turn a vague worry about a model into an experiment, run it, and say what the result does and does not prove.

  • You read transcripts closely. You catch the small thing that makes the whole result wrong.

  • You have put research into production systems, especially post-training, distillation, or evaluation that something depends on.

  • You write clearly enough that your results change what other people do.

  • You can decide fast with incomplete evidence and defend the call with data.

     
NICE TO HAVE
  • Published work on control, dangerous capability evaluations, oversight, or interpretability.

  • RLHF or RLAIF experience, and a view on how training choices show up in behavior.

  • You built or ran a public benchmark or agent task suite.

  • You have run many agents at once: sandboxes, containers, logging.

  • You have advised on AI safety or governance policy.

COMPENSATION

Base Salary

$250,000 - $450,000

Cash Bonus

Sizable performance bonus tied to project and company milestones

Equity

Generous early-stage grant

Benefits

Health, dental, vision + flexible PTO

No similar roles found yet — browse all abundant jobs.

THE JOB ELIGIBILITY CHECKER

Check a job